What is Saga Pattern in Distributed Systems?
Understanding How Microservices Coordinate Distributed Transactions
In distributed systems, microservices provide ways for building scalable and resilient applications. These applications often require communication among multiple services to process a single request. For example, a single request, like ordering a product, may involve multiple steps and services: inventory, payment, shipping, etc. This distributed nature makes ensuring data consistency and atomicity a complex challenge, especially when each service has its own database and operates independently. How do you guarantee that if the payment service succeeds, the inventory is updated, and the shipping process is initiated while maintaining data integrity? Traditional ACID transactions, designed for monolithic applications with a single database, don't work well across multiple services.
What is the Saga Pattern?
The Saga pattern is a design pattern that helps manage transaction updates across multiple services by breaking them down into a sequence of small local transactional updates, called "saga steps" or "subtransactions." Each step represents a unit of work that interacts with a single service. Once a step is completed, it triggers the next step in the sequence. If any step fails, the saga executes compensating updates to undo the changes made by the previous steps, ensuring that the system returns to its initial state.
Types of Saga Approaches
There are two main approaches to implementing the Saga Pattern: Orchestration and Choreography.
Orchestration
In this approach, a central orchestrator service coordinates the saga steps. The orchestrator tells each service when to execute its local transaction. It maintains the state of the saga and handles any failures by invoking compensating transactions. The orchestrator knows the entire saga flow.
How it works
The client initiates the saga by communicating with the orchestrator. The orchestrator then invokes the first service. Upon successful completion, the orchestrator moves to the next step, invoking the corresponding service. If a service fails, the orchestrator triggers compensating transactions in reverse order.
Choreography
In the Choreography approach, there is no central coordinator. Instead, each service involved in the saga knows its role and communicates with the other services through events or messages. Each service listens for specific events and performs local transactions when the appropriate event is received. The saga flow is distributed across the services.
How it works
The client initiates the saga by communicating with the first service. This service performs its transaction and publishes an event. Other services, listening for this event, perform their respective transactions and publish their events. This chain reaction continues until the saga is complete. If a service fails, it publishes a compensating event, triggering other services to execute compensating transactions.
Orchestration v/s Choreography
Choreography has no single point of failure, as each service manages its part of the saga.
Orchestration provides simplified error handling and monitoring with centralized control. In contrast, each service needs to handle its errors in Choreography, which can lead to complex error-handling logic.
In Orchestration, the coordinator needs to know about all the services involved in the saga, which can lead to tight coupling. In contrast, in Choreography, services need to agree on the events and the order of transactions, which can lead to overhead in coordination.
Pros and Cons of Saga Pattern
Pros
Data consistency: The Saga Pattern ensures data consistency across multiple services, even in the face of failures.
Scalability: It allows for scalable and loosely coupled services, as each service can operate independently.
Flexibility: The Saga Pattern can handle complex business transactions that involve multiple services and steps.
Cons
Complexity: Implementing the Saga Pattern can be complex, especially for large-scale systems with many services.
Error handling: Managing errors and compensating transactions can be challenging, especially in the choreography approach.
Performance overhead: The need to track the saga's state and handle compensating transactions can introduce performance overhead.
If you enjoyed this article, please hit the ❤️ like button.
If you think someone else will benefit from this, then please 🔁 share this post.