2 Comments
User's avatar
Ihtemadul Haque's avatar

The REPEATABLE READ isolation level can lead to deadlocks in two common scenarios:

Scenario 1:

• Transaction A reads a data item, then tries to write to it.

• Transaction B reads the same data item, then tries to write to it.

Here’s what happens:

1. Both transactions start by acquiring S-locks (shared locks) on the data item for their read operations.

2. When they try to write, both need to upgrade their S-locks to X-locks (exclusive locks).

3. Transaction A can’t upgrade because Transaction B is holding an S-lock, and Transaction B can’t upgrade because Transaction A is holding an S-lock.

4. Neither can proceed, causing a deadlock.

Scenario 2:

Similar to Scenario 1, but the deadlock arises because transactions read and then write to the same data item. The sequence of acquiring an S-lock for the read and then requesting an X-lock for the write creates contention.

To avoid these deadlocks:

1. Minimize read-before-write patterns in transactions.

2. Use X-locks directly if you know a write will follow the read.

3. Implement retry mechanisms to handle deadlocks when they occur.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 7, 2024
Comment deleted
Sid's avatar

Thank you so much for your kind words. Please don't forget to share with your friends. 😃